This passage is the epigraph to the novel, telling the reader what the book is intended to be and mapping out some of its basic stylistic and thematic ground. The statement that the book is not “an adventure” separates it from most war novels in that it will dispense with elements of romance and excitement in favor of a stark, unsentimental presentation. The clarification that “death is not an adventure to those who stand face to face with it” suggests that books that tell stories of war as though they were exciting adventures do not do justice to the actual experience of soldiers. Death may be an adventure to the reader, sitting comfortably at home, but it is anything but that to the soldier who is actually confronted with the possibility of being blown to pieces at any moment. The epigraph also declares that the book will be the story of an entire generation, one “destroyed by the war” even if not actually killed off by it. The epigraph thus opens the novel’s exploration of the effect of the war on those who fought it; war is a transforming force that not only injures and traumatizes but also annihilates selfhood. hope this helps
2 houses; the senate and house of representatives
<span>In an oligarchy a few people control most or all of the money and power in that country. The wealthiest people most likely benefit from this arrangement. In a communist system the leaders seek to distribute money and power equally among all the people. The wealthiest people therefore would lose a lot of their wealth leading them to support the oligarchy.</span>
Answer:
I dont see a picture.... it could just be me though...
Explanation:
Answer:
What changed could be that a two-party system was established for our elections, we no longer go by the articles of confederation and instead go by the constitution, and what stayed the same I would say would be the right to free speech and assembly
