The correct in-text citation of this quote from page 1 of Saki's story is C. (Saki, 1).
This is mainly because there is the use of parenthesis to show the name of the author and then a comma, followed by the page number and then the parenthesis is closed.
<h3>What is an In-Text Citation?</h3>
This refers to the quotations made to make references to the intellectual property of an author as this shows that adequate credit is given to the author.
Hence, we can see that from the given story, it is told that Saki personifies nature when he says, "a deed of Nature's own violence overwhelmed them"
Therefore, the correct in-text citation of this quote from page 1 of Saki's story is C. (Saki, 1).
Read more about in-text citations here:
brainly.com/question/3521626
#SPJ1
Ask your teacher trust me she will give you the explanation you are looking for;)
Answer:
This is a personal paragraph, so try to re-word it so it sounds like you (so the teacher doesn't suspect anything)
Explanation:
2041, that's <em>five</em> presidents away from now. With that, a lot of things probably have changed, jobs, clothing, movies, life styles, a LOT of things would change. Looking at jobs in 20 years from now, I would probably work at some company, or some good job I'm at that pays around 60k-70k. Maybe currency has changed, it could all just be digital, or not, since it's only 20 years. I couldn't think how my family would look like since I'm not even 18 yet. I'm more of a present minded person, so I just hope things don't spiral out of control by the time of 2041
<span> "Ambush," O’Brien describes killing a man while serving in war. He had no intention of killing him—he reacted without thinking. O’Brien feels guilty about having killed another human being, even though his fellow soldier tries to soothe him with the logic that the man would have been killed eventually anyway. However, trying to justify having killed someone, O’Brien explains that his training as a soldier prompted him to act involuntarily when he lobbed the grenade upon spotting an enemy soldier. Twenty years later, long after the war has ended, O’Brien is unable to admit to his daughter, Kathleen, that he has killed another person. He feels guilt and denial about having killed a man, and experiences recurrent flashbacks and visions. Through his story, O’Brien conveys that a soldier is a changed person after he has witnessed such a war, and those who have not been in a war cannot begin to understand the emotional turmoil that soldiers go through.</span>
