Answer:
would not have been compelled to answer because of the attorney-client privilege
Explanation:
According to my research on different attorney benefits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the attorney would not have been compelled to answer because of the attorney-client privilege. As soon as a client pays any amount of money to a lawyer then anything said is protected under attorney-client privilege, in other words the attorney is prevented from disclosing any information that the client may have shared regardless of how incriminating it may be.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: The Land Ordinance of 1785 addressed the issue of how to divide the western lands acquired by the United States in the Treaty of Paris.
Explanation: The Land Ordinance of 1785 was adopted by the United States Congress of the Confederation on May 20, 1785. It set up a standardized system whereby settlers could purchase title to farmland in the undeveloped west. ... The 1785 ordinance laid the foundations of land policy until passage of the Homestead Act of 1862.
Hope this helps^^
Answer: Her prediction is a hypothesis
Explanation:
A hypothesis is a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of restricted evidence as a starting point for more investigation.
