I think D I’m not sure sorry that’s all I can do
Answer:
d. $1050.
Explanation:
We multiply each account balance by the expected uncollectible amount and then addd them to get the expected total for doutful accounts
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}Date&Amount&Expected&uncollectible\\$not due&10000&0.02&200\\$up to 30&5000&0.05&250\\$up to 60&3000&0.1&300\\$more than 61&800&0.5&400\\&&Total&1150\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7DDate%26Amount%26Expected%26uncollectible%5C%5C%24not%20due%2610000%260.02%26200%5C%5C%24up%20to%2030%265000%260.05%26250%5C%5C%24up%20to%2060%263000%260.1%26300%5C%5C%24more%20than%2061%26800%260.5%26400%5C%5C%26%26Total%261150%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Balance of the allowance account: 100
The expense will be the adjustment made on the allowance to get the expected balance of 1,150
1,150 - 100 = 1,050
we increase the allowance bu 1,050 to get our expected uncollectible fro maccounts receivable agaisnt the bad debt expense ofthe period.
Answer:
<h3>A limited liability company is the US-specific form of a private limited company. It is a business structure that can combine the pass-through taxation of a partnership or sole proprietorship with the limited liability of a corporation. </h3>
hope it help :)
Answer:
The correct answer is Demand is inelastic, but not perfectly.
Explanation:
Inelastic demand is that demand that is not very sensitive to a change in price. In this way, before a variation in the price the quantity demanded reacts in a less than proportional way. For example, if the price increases by 10% and in response the quantity demanded is reduced by less than 10%, then the demand is said to be inelastic.
The elasticity of demand, also known as the elasticity-price of demand, is defined as the percentage change of the quantity demanded before a percentage change in the price.
Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
