Answer:
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Explanation:
<u>For First stock </u>
Total dividend from first stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.32 * 2 = $0.64
HPR of first stock = (Total dividend from first stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($0.64 + ($31.72 - $27.85)) / $27.85 = 0.1619, or 16.19%
Annualized holding period return of first stock = HPR of first stock * Number 6 months in a year = 16.19% * 2 = 32.38%
<u>For Second stock </u>
Total dividend from second stock = Dividend per share * Number quarters = $0.67 * 4 = $2.68
Since you expect to sell the stock in one year, we have:
Annualized holding period return of second stock = The 1-year HPR for the second stock = (Total dividend from second stock + (Selling price after six months - Initial selling price per share)) / Initial selling price = ($2.68+ ($36.79 - $34.98)) / $34.98 = 0.1284, or 12.84%
Since the Annualized holding period return of first stock of 32.38% is higher than the Annualized holding period return of second stock of 12.84%. the first stock will provide the better annualized holding period return.
The 1-year HPR for the second stock is <u>12.84</u>%. The stock that will provide the better annualized holding period return is <u>Stock 1</u>.
Answer:
The assets at the end of 2018 will be for 222,000
Explanation:
We solve using the accounting equation:
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
2017
Equity 125,000
Assets 145,000
<em>Assets = Liabilities + Equity</em>
145,000 = Liabilities + 125,000
145,000 - 125,000 = Liabilities
Liaiblities = 20,000
2018
Equity 131,000
"Liabilities increase by 71,000"
Liabilities = 2017 + increase = 20,000 + 71,000 = 91,000
<em>Assets = Liabilities + Equity</em>
Assets = 91,000 + 131,000 = 222,000
The answer for this statement is TRUE
Answer:
a. H0 : U ≥ 15
Ha : U < 15
b. Type I error is incorrectly conclude that the pain is reduced in less than 15 minutes.
c. Type II error is fail to conclude that time for pain reduction is less than 15 mints when actually its less than 15 minutes.
Explanation:
Null hypothesis is a statement that is to be tested against the alternative hypothesis and then decision is taken whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
Type I error is one in which we reject a true null hypothesis.
Type II error is one in which we fail to reject the null hypothesis that is actually false.
