4, 5, 6, hope that helps.
If scientists made medicine to live forever with no strings attached then maybe I would take it. It depends on who it is handing me it, If it was a bad person then no but if they were good people then maybe, I would only do it if my parents told me to. Did you know Sonnet 65 is by William Shakespeare and is one of several poems that discusses time, aging, and what writing can and cannot do to fight against these forces? Shakespeare's central theme is the opposition between the transitory, delicate nature of beauty and the devastating effect on the beauty of mortality and its principal instrument, time. The opening questions seem rhetorical, indirectly arguing the poet's conviction that beauty is no match for aging and death. Again I wouldn't know what to do if doctors or scientists gave me random medicine then I don't know. I know if the medicine was important then my parents would give it to me not random scientists.
Answer: I'd say it's Emotive language
Explanation:
Emotive language is a literary device. The deliberate choice of words to influence or to elicit emotion. Who ever has wrote that used emotion 'she needed', 'attention and warmth', to evoke emotion and catch the reader.
Answer:
3
Explanation:
Sentence three is the best choice to introduce the topic because it relates to all the other sentences in an important way. As the primary topic of the entire passage is the white moose, the rarity of the animal, the range of the moose, and the relationship that the moose population has with humans, it is appropriate to mentioned the animal in the first sentence.
First i believe its a "figure of speech".
Second they use this to say "it wont be easy but it is possible."
