Answer and Explanation:
This is a personal question about your opinion. I will provide an example below. Feel free to add or edit anything to fit your beliefs and opinions:
<u>My definition of beauty does go beyond looks, although I must agree that all of us probably still judge people first based on their appearance. Still, I believe personality, character, manners, and actions are a better way to convey one's true beauty. Indeed, it is what most people would call "inner beauty", and I truly think it exists. </u>
<u>If someone despises or mistreats others, no matter how physically beautiful that someone is, we will end up finding them ugly because their actions and traits are ugly. The same happens the other way around. A person may not be considered very attractive, but if they are gentle, polite, and intelligent, for instance, we will perceive that person as beautiful and will prefer their company over the attractive but rude person.</u>
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because the rooster doesn't control the suns rising if he didn't crow the sun would still rise
Answer:
Надеюсь, это помогает.
Explanation:
1) He asked why she was upset
2) He asked me to give him a hand.
3) He told us to march.
4) She told me I could wear he jacket
5) She asked for the door to be closed
6) He told me not to park here.
7) She told me she wants to learn Russian
8) He said he was tired
9) He told me hed meet me at the main entrance
10) She wondered what I liked the best about my job
11) She asked where she was
12) I told her she was sleeping
13) He told him to see a doctor
14) He wondered if I had tried any other extreme sports
15)She told him that she broke his mobile.
Answer:
The statement that most accurately paraphrases the lines is:
A. What intelligent person does not know that riches disappear in the end?
Explanation:
When we paraphrase, we reword the ideas expressed by someone. We do not change the ideas, nor do we summarize. We say the exact same thing, but with different words. Let's take a look at what is being said here:
<em>What knowing man knows not the ghostly,
</em>
<em>Waste-like end of worldly wealth</em>
The lines above are questioning something. They are asking, maybe in rhetorical way, what intelligent man does not know about how material wealth disappears in the end. The adjective "knowing" is the same as "knowledgeable" or "intelligent". And "waste-like end" means the wealth does not really value much. It disappears ("ghostly", like everything else.
With that in mind, we can easily see that letter A is the one conveying all those ideas:
A. What intelligent person does not know that riches disappear in the end?
