Answer:
ram:hey how r u
rathika:I'm fine and u
ram:I'm not fine
rathik:what happened?
ram:my parents are getting divorced
rathika:what ? you can block them from doing that.
ram:I will try , OK what about your family I haven't see your father
rathika:my father died since 2 months
ram:oh I'm really sorry , OK then bye
rathika:its OK , bye
The answer to this question is"
<span>Which choice explains one possible way to correct a dependent clause fragment?
A-"C</span><span>onnect it to the sentence before or after it"
Hoped This Helped, </span> <span>Tanyahowell41
Your Welcome :)</span>
Let's cut the chit chat, and formalities. I'm not one for greetings or unnecessary niceties.
The answer is A.
Why?
Because a run-on consists of two or more independent clauses that are not separated by a colon or semicolon.
This is evident in Choice A
The sentences that best support the claim are: Sentences 2 and 3
<h3>What is a Supporting Detail?</h3>
This refers to the use of evidence to validate a claim by showing the facts of it.
Hence, from the complete text, we can see that there is a narration of the use of microchips and their increased use in recent times due to technology, and sentences 2 and 3 support this.
Read more about supporting details here:
brainly.com/question/26197905
#SPJ4
