<span> Paul Baumer and Albert Kropp scoff at the term because it is so ironic. </span>
As a result of the new fugitive slave law from the Compromise of 1850:
- A.) Many Northerners who were not abolitionists were outraged at the sight of people being forced to return to slavery.
The new fugitive slave law of 1850 was an effort by the Southerners to ensure that the slaves remained in their control.
The law was meant to reward people who were able to capture fleeing slaves and return them to their masters.
This new law did not go well with the Northerners who were unhappy to see slaves being subjected to a life of misery in the hands of their masters.
Abolitionists increased their efforts to protest the end of slavery. Those involved in the Underground Railroad also doubled their efforts.
So, this law was met with widespread resistance.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/1675991
Answer: The British response to the Boston Tea Party was to impose even more stringent policies on the Massachusetts colony. The Coercive Acts levied fines for the destroyed tea, sent British troops to Boston, and rewrote the colonial charter of Massachusetts, giving broadly expanded powers to the royally appointed governor.
Explanation:
I believe it's camelot. Sorry if I'm wrong.
Is this a multiple choice? If so what are the different options?