Question

Communist movements spread throughout Europe after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. The leaders of the new Soviet Union made known that one of their goals was to spread Communism throughout the world. Communism is an economic system in which the government owns most businesses and property and shares the wealth created by that property equally among the people. (Of course, the sharing part never quite happened the way it was supposed to.)
Socialism is the belief that government should be active in a role as regulator of the economy and should provide services (health care and education, for example) with tax money. A small socialist movement rose in the United States during the late 1800s and early 1900s, but soon ran afoul of the Red Scare that swept the nation in the 1920s. Socialists, as a political movement, represent only a small percentage of Americans today.

Answer the following questions:

Why do you think socialism never found widespread support in the United States?
What good might come from more government programs and regulations?
What negative aspects can result from more government involvement in the economy?

Answer 1

First Answer:

The socialism never found support among the people in United States due to small power of the workers Union. Also, companies have more political and financial power over their demands.

Second answer:

There could be more support for the homeless and poor people in big cities. Health care and some childhood protection against poverty might be another benefits from it.

Third answer:

The negative aspects we could imagine as the political power of unions increased among the workers. They would start attempting a coup across the country in order to start a social-communist regime. Another problem could be the increase in corruption, based on the good faith of the poor, that is, they could "buy votes" among the poor by threatening them with benefits' cut if the worker does not support them or does not vote for them.

Answer 2

Answer:

1. Fear of communism, the American tradition of self-reliance, political opposition from the wealth/business interests.

2. Taking care of poor/vulnerable people, reign in abuses of big business and private wealth.

3. High tax burdens if programs become too generous, a risk that people would lose incentive to work hard.

Explanation: