Answer:
B. Maybe. The FTC would scrutinize the merger and make a case-by-case decision.
Explanation:
If we considered the historical guidelines of FTC for the merger purpose so may be FTC could permit the merger between the two firms that could result in HHI of 1,025 after the merger as the merger represent the moderal level of the concentration in the market area so here FTC should analyzes the merger with cash to cash basis
Therefore the option b is correct
You'll receive the Student Air Report....
60% of $90,000 is: 60/100*90,000=0.6*90,000=54,000
<span>So, the sales associate plans $64,000 from the total income to come from sold listings .
</span>40% of $90,000 is: 40/100*90,000=0.4*90,000=36,000
So, the sales associate plans $36,000 from the total income to come from sales made.
<span>If the average commission from listings sold is $3,000 she must cell X=64,000/3000=21,3 ~22 listings (at least) in order to achieve her goal.</span>
Answer:
The short answer to that is No, Starbucks will not change its foreign market entry strategy.
Explanation:
The reasons are as follows:
- did Howard Schultz lose his shares when he stepped down? This is highly unlikely and according to the rules of corporate governance may depend on his contract. So stepping down as the chairman does not necessarily translate to losing control.
- Corporations such as Starbucks: don't just up and change direction. Strategies are usually vetted by the board of directors. Whoever the majority shareholder is (corporate person or individual) will always have a say regarding the expansion of the business.
- Howard Schultz has stepped down in 2018. At that time, Starbucks had a total of 28,000 stores in 77 countries. Currently, there are 15,000 in 50 countries. This reduction didn't happen because Howard stepped down but because of the recent pandemic which hit the globe in 2020.
Cheers
Answer:
Should be done: a counter cyclical or a growth-oriented fiscal policy ,deficit spending and stabilize the aggregate demand.
Explanation:
Keynesian economy is a macroeconomic theory based on the views of the 20th century British economist John Maynard Keynes. Keynes' economy advocates a mixed economy where the private sector is predominant but the state and the public sector play a major role. According to the Keynesian theory, the sum of all the micro-economic behaviors shown by all individuals and businesses results in inefficiency and the economy operates at a level below its potential output and growth. When total demand for products is insufficient, the economy enters a crisis and unnecessary unemployment arises due to defensive behavior of the producers. In such cases, the government may pursue policies to increase aggregate demand, and as a result may accelerate economic activities and reduce unemployment. Most Keynesian propose policies to stabilize the business cycle. For example, if the unemployment level is too high, the state can pursue a growth-oriented monetary policy.
Keynes was thinking of reviving the economy with low interest and state investments as a solution to the Great Depression. The government increases investment income and consequently consumption, resulting in more production and investment, resulting in increased consumption again. The first economic stimulus investment triggers a series of events and the subsequent investment provides a much tougher economic efficiency. According to Keynes, money supply is provided by monetary authority (eg central bank) and monetary policy affects prices. When interest rates fall below this normal rate, investors avoid buying bonds and prefer to hold cash in anticipation of higher rates. When interest rates are above this normal rate, they tend to buy bonds with the expectation that they will fall. Therefore, it can be said that there is a negative relationship between money demand and interest rate.
