A desire for good farmland caused many colonists to defy the proclamation; others merely resented the royal restrictions on trade and migration. Ultimately, the Proclamation of 1763 failed to stem the tide of westward expansion
On what book you have to say the name of the book so people can answer you question
I surmise that at the outset, we ought to have had extraordinary sensitivity to the means being taken in the French Revolution since we had a considerable measure of similitudes in our current transformation and theirs. Yet, it was their King that helped us win our upset by sending troops to battle our war against the British. I don't imagine that is was ideal for us to betray him. We ought to have by one means or another had conciliatory relations to the progressive pioneers to stop the carnage. We didn't need to slaughter our lord to set up our nation, I figure we could have mediated to stop the losses of the French Revolution.
The answer to your question is,
It weakened support for the war in the South.
-Mabel <3
Because in the north people were not really into slavery as much as in the south
