Answer: This passage does commit a fallacy; specifically, it does commit an appeal to fear fallacy.
Explanation:
Appeal to fear is a type of informal fallacy that seeks to convince supporters to back an idea by creating fear towards the opposite option. It´s a fallacy that evokes the fear of something terribly wrong happening in the present or in the future in order to convince people of accepting a specific idea to be right.
In this case, the student´s participation in the administration's decision-making process is presented as an option that can only lead to chaos.
The answer to the question above is FIELDWORK. From the term itself, the work involves in the "field" or in the actual environment wherein the researcher him or herself immerses in the natural environment in order to accomplish a given work or task. This already involves participant observation since the researcher witnesses the actual behavior of the participants in the field.
Answer:
Can't have a state fighting someone in it's own court.
Explanation:
It's a massive conflict of interest. Everyone in that courtroom is being paid by said state. believe the FF did this to maintain objectivity.
Democratic country has its all freedom and equal rights. However, it is too free that people tend to do whatever they want and say whatever they want without thinking that this already is making other people lives miserable. Like the internet, bashing are very normal to people,
The answer to this question is <span>the growing availability of new media that allows for citizen participation.
The new media now allow basically anyone to grow online and share little information that they know to be seen by millions of people online.
The negative side of this is this make people trapped within a certain point of view due to the overload of content on the web.</span>
