The declaration of war included exhilaration, joy, and a sense of community and purpose in the service of some great mission.
Explanation:
Declaration of war in an act in which one country comes up against another country to do war. Generally, war declares when the solution cannot be taken by with the conversation. The war may result in the greater degree of damage and loss with the material and lives of the people.
Apart from this, war also declares to show the power of a country in front of another country or countries. The declaration of war included exhilaration, joy, and a sense of community and purpose in the service of some great mission.
Pro
-free day out of school
-learn that he actually didn’t find American
Con
-he didn’t discover America
-he was a bad man
This excerpt shows how Debs has endured and shared the harsh working conditions of laborers (D.).
Many verbal groups indicate his physical involvement in the working people's daily life and how it affected him emotionally:
- "I had ... been stung by the exposure ... of the rail;"
- "I was with the boys ... at the broken engine's side;"
- "helped to bear;"
- "feel the burden."
As for the harsh working conditions, they are described by the following nouns and adjectives:
- "hardship;"
- "weary;"
- "bruised and bleeding bodies;"
- "burden."
We know that they are laborers and not, for example, business owners, because their work is very manual. Besides, the term "working class" appears in the text, as well as "Proletaire" which is borrowed from French and means "belonging to the lower social classes."
The early 20th century was an era of business expansion and progressive reform in the United States. ... At home, this meant expanding the right to vote to women and a number of election reforms such as the recall, referendum, and direct election of Senators. Abroad, it meant trying to make the world safe for democracy.
Answer and Explanation:
The Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia analyzed that the Cherokee Nation was considered a separate political entity that could not be run by the state. Georgia's license law was illegitimate, and Worcester's conviction should be overturned. Dating back of early colonial America, the Native American communities were conceived of as "separate nations,” the Court first pointed to evidence. The Court then claimed that today's "treaties and laws of the United States [also] contemplate the Indian territory separated from that of the states, and provide that all intercourse with them shall be carried on exclusively by the government of the union."
That is why the United States can negotiate the terms of Indian lands and the use of thence. States were shortfalls of constitutional power to deal with such "nations" at all. Thus, Georgia could not pass the license law. Moreover, it also could not convict Worcester for violation of the law.
