Answer:
true
Explanation:
Services are different than products because they:
- products can be stored for future use while services perish immediately after being performed or if they are not consumed, e.g. unsold spaces in a theater cannot be stored for later use ⇒ Perishability
- products are tangible, while services cannot be measured, weighted, etc. ⇒ Intangibility
- products can be mass produced and can be homogeneous, while services are unique because every time they are consumed, the experience varies depending on the conditions and circumstances that surround it ⇒ Heterogeneity
- You can own and transfer the title of a product, while you cannot transfer the title of services, e.g. you rent the room of a hotel for a night but that doesn't make you owner of the room ⇒ Ownership
- Products are independent and separate from the people or machines that produce them, while services cannot be separated from the people or things that provide them ⇒ Inseparability
Answer:
The reason why people get engaged in business is because they become more productive and people engage in business to make money and get returns on investment.
Explanation: This is the answer I hope this helped you out.
Answer:
By claiming your web presence, you're protected from other people, with the same name, claiming it before you. You also gain control over how you're perceived online, and thus what employers find out about you when they conduct their search
Explanation:
Answer: false
Explanation:
The statement is false because cost leadership is not really sustainable as it's cost effective due to the maintenance charge required to keep them in a great care despite the low operational cost being runned by the organization
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
