Answer:
For is the prepositional phrase.
Their opinions are compared when they both agree that money should be spent on important things. However, they disagree on what is important.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Maria Elisa wants to buy a gift for her favorite teacher.
- She believes this is very important, as Christmas is a time to give gifts to loved ones.
- Because this is an important time, she wants to buy a special gift, as she believes the money should be spent on important and special things.
- Mami agrees that the money has to be spent on important and special things, but she doesn't believe that giving someone a gift is important.
Mami likes to save money and likes to buy cheap and simple gifts, leaving the money for when an emergency arises.
This question is about "A Present For Mrs. Robertson."
More information:
brainly.com/question/20105775?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
C) There is a bay in Puerto Rico that seems to light up at night; the light comes from tiny organisms in the water.
Explanation:
A semi-colon usually stands in for a period when two sentences are related. In the sentence, "There is a bay in Puerto Rico that seems to light up at night; the light comes from tiny organisms in the water," you can replace the semi-colon with a period and it would still make sense. They relate to each other as well. So this sentence is punctuated correctly.
(Further explanation for those who really need it):
A doesn't make sense because the semi-colon isn't needed. It'd need a comma in place of the semi-colon.
B doesn't make sense because the semi-colon isn't needed, either. It'd need a comma in place of the semi-colon.
C is correct. It is explained above.
D could possibly use a semi-colon, but it's placed in the wrong spot. It'd probably be placed between "world" and "people." But it sounds a little janky to me, so I think it doesn't need a semi-colon at all. "World" should have a period after it and the "p" in "people" needs to be capitalized. Either way, it isn't punctuated correctly.
Answer: Every day, we make hundreds of choices.
Explanation: We choose what to wear, what to do when we get home from work or school, and how to respond when someone makes fun of us. Sometimes we also make big decision, such as what kind of school to go to, what career to pursue, whether to get married, and whether to have a child. Sometimes people make decisions that are even bigger than these because the decisions affect hundreds or millions of people - decisions about war and peace or about changes in the laws. Even if we ourselves don't make such big decisions, we need to understand how they are made. Most of the time, we make these choices without thinking. For small, routine choices such as how to respond when your friend starts a conversation with you, you do not need to think. You have learned how to talk and how to behave in a friendly way without thinking at all, and your habits serve you well. You could behave differently than you do, of course, but your behavior is probably fine as it is. In other cases, though, you THINK about your decisions, from what to wear in the morning to how to spend your money. Sometimes people make choices without thinking when they really ought to think a bit. For example, we sometimes say things that hurt people's feelings and then we feel bad for having said them. Can you think of other examples of things we do because we didn't think first? WHEN it is worth thinking about decisions and, mostly, HOW to think about them once you start thinking. It will teach by example. You will be given a problem about decision making. First, think about the problem and try to answer it. You can discuss the problem with someone else. Then turn the page and look at the answer carefully. Where do these answers come from, and why are they right? The answers come from a field of study called decision theory. It is taught in colleges and graduate schools. It is sometimes used as a way of making very important decisions such as whether to have surgery or where to locate an airport. People who study decision theory and write about agree about some things and disagree about others.
Summary: =====> The poem Sympathy, focuses on the relationships of freedom, and oppression, of an individual to an oppressive society; the bird to its cage, and of an artist to expression.
Question: =====> The problem faced by both the Bird, and the Author of the poem sympathy is that.
Answer: =====> They both face barriers that restrict their freedom.
Hope that helps!!!!