This is a delightful and witty short story with that very Russian sense of the surreal combined with satire, that one sees in Bulgakov's writings (Bulgakov was an admirer of Gogol's work). I could go into all sorts of linguistic and psychological analysis of the symbolism of a man losing his nose, or I probably could if I knew Russian. But I suspect that rather misses the point. As the story says: Nonsense really does occur in this world, and, sometimes, nonsense altogether without an element of plausibility. I do not know what you can compare it with. Have you got any options? I think that you can get help with it if you check i tat the professional site. Prime Writings is the site with interesting blog on essay writing.
Was cancelled due to weather.
had a heart wrenching new episode on live tv.
now is being made into a movie.
is about a post apocalyptic war zone.
is Tom and Jerry.
Whitney's role in the story is hes like a side character because he never try to look for Rainsford
Yes, it is B, it is a defining relative clause, notice that without the relative clause the sentence feels empty <em>Only the players are going to get sunburned today. </em>
Defining relative clauses use <em>who/that</em> for people, <em>which/that</em> for things and they are not delimited by commas.
<em>Only the people that/who arrived first can enter.</em>
<em>This the house that/which I used to live in.</em>
Non-defining clauses are just extra comments, optionally they can be removed about the previous noun/pronoun, they are separed by commas and <em>that</em> cannot be used.
<em>Mary,who wears glasses, lives next door.</em>
<em>This country, which was a super power in the past, is still facing amajor economic crisis.</em>
