To solve problems and improve condition in the state
Prediction for the reactivity of a chlorine directly on the double bond of an alkene would be in the following:
A dipole is created in the halogen molecule as the non-polar chlorine molecule approaches the alkene double bond.
A chloride ion is produced when the pi link in the alkene double bond breaks and establishes a bond with the delta positive Cl atom.
The chloride ion undergoes carbocation as a result, and along with the carbocation, a single electron pair forms a dative bond.
Carbon double bonds are more powerful and compact than single bonds. The number of bonds is two.
Additionally, double bonds have a lot of electrons, which could make them more reactive in the presence of a powerful electron acceptor.
To learn more about Chlorine ion here
brainly.com/question/1127028
#SPJ4
Children receiving prizes for good behavior is another illustration of behavior modification.
Performing chores or managing their anger, for example, would allow the positive behavior of doing duties to continue and the unfavorable behavior of having a difficult-to-control temper to lessen or cease to occur (become extinct).
Positive punishment, negative punishment, positive reinforcement, and negative reinforcement are all used in behavior modification.
Positive programming, modeling, shaping, the token economy, self-monitoring, and praise and approbation are some examples of behavior modification techniques that can be used to improve behavior.
The fully practical, the theoretical-practical, and the purely theoretical styles of behavior can be divided into three categories. The first is a determining reason, the second is a motivating reason, and the third is a supporting reason. These three forms of behavior have three separate causes.
Learn more about " behavior " to visit here;
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
Decreases increases i believe is the answer
