Maggie, a graduate student at a local university, is interested in the impact on intelligence of the no child left behind legislation. so she gives an intelligence test to people ranging in age from 15 to 45. maggie is conducting a cross sectional study. It is also known as a cross-sectional analysis, transversal study, prevalence study. It is also a type of observational study which analyzes data collected from a population, or a representative subset, at a specific point in time—that is, cross-sectional data.
Answer:
(A) Rational decision making, bounded rationality, and intuition
Explanation:
Rational decision making is a multi-step process for making choices between alternatives. The process ofrational decision making favors logic, objectivity, and analysis over subjectivity and insight.
Bounded rationality is the idea that in decision-making,rationality of individuals is limited by the information they have, the cognitive limitations of their minds, and the finite amount of time they have to make a decision.
Intuition is the ability to have a grasp on a situation or information without the need for reasoning. The opposite ofintuitive decision making is rational decision making, which is when individuals use analytics, facts and a step-by-step process to come to a decision.
Rational decision making, bounded rationality, and intuition plays an important role in making decisions.
Answer
Explanation:
2 problems, well it is REALLY expensive to operate
also it doesn't work good in small areas
Answer:
trade agreements with other countries
Explanation:
The invention of the automobile was in the EARLY 1900s, not the late. The development of the computer did not really effect / impact lives until 1990s and so does not really fit the question. The shopping malls could be an answer, but I think trade agreements is the best answer.
Answer:
An appellate court can <u>modify</u> a lower court's decision
Explanation:
When a case is tried in a lower court, the losing party is allowed to appeal the lower court's decision if it does not agree with it.
In such instances, the case is then tried in an appellate court. The <u>appellate court, on review of evidence and after hearing the merits of the case, has the power to </u><u>modify</u><u> or reverse the decision of the lower court.</u>
