Explanation:
<em><u>they</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>were</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>captivated</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>inspired</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>by</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>homers</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>characters</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>exploits</u></em>
Answer:
The correct answer is option C.
Leo Tolstoy contrasts the characters of Gerasim and Ivan Ilyich in The Death of Ivan Ilyich by showing that Ivan Ilyich doesn’t treat Gerasim as his son, but Gerasim treats Ivan as his father.
Explanation:
Even though in several ocassions during the novella Ivan doesn't seem to treat Gerasim as his son but Geraism still continues to treat his father as such, with respect.
Answer:
I'm sorry buh I can't oppose this coz
Education is important in the life of a child and it is the best legacy a parent can give a child. ... An educated person will always remain relevant and employable to make use of the skills and knowledge he has acquired. Any parent who wants a better future for his child will not but give the child good education.
Explanation:
Sorry
Answer:
I believe it would be hire, and honest.
Explanation:
Rich people have the money to hire poor people, and the poorest of the poor people become honest
Answer:
- Congress had changed the meaning of the First Amendment, rather than enforcing it.
- Congress had created a law that was not proportional to the problem it was fixing.
- Congress had taken away states’ rights by passing the RFRA.
Explanation:
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 was passed in light of the Supreme Court upholding an Oregon state decision to deny two American Indian men unemployment benefits for having taken a banned substance which they normally use in their religious events.
Congress passed this bill with only 3 Senators opposing it so that it could prevent such from happening again.
The Supreme Court however ruled the Act as unconstitutional as it claimed that Congress was overexerting its powers by: changing the meaning of the First Amendment, creating a law that was disproportionate to the problems it was fixing and overexerting federal power on states and taking away their rights to manage their affairs in this regard.
