1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lozanna [386]
3 years ago
7

In 2003 u.s. soldiers abused iraqi prisoners held at abu ghraib, 20 miles west of baghdad. the prisoners were stripped, made to

wear bags over their heads, and sexually humiliated while the guards laughed and took photographs. how is this abuse similar to or different from what took place in the stanford prison experiment?
History
1 answer:
Veseljchak [2.6K]3 years ago
7 0
During the Stanford experiment guards and prisoners were randomly chosen. They developed roles as officers who applied authoritarian measures by subjecting prisoners to psychological torture. This was similar when the U.S soldiers subjected the Iraqi soldiers to humiliation at Abu Ghraib. The prisoners accepted psychological abuses where U.S soldiers photographed and took pictures of the Iraqi soldiers which was similarly done to prisoners of the Stanford experiment where certain portions of the experiment were filmed.
You might be interested in
Sectionalism can BEST be defined as
pochemuha
BEFORE WE START:
Sectionalism has quite a few definitions. I don't know what it means, but I'm willing to do some research and provide you with the best definition.

DEFINE SECTIONALISM:
→When you are loyal to someone's region or their section of a country (if they're not "over" an entire country). 
→"Undue concern with local interests or petty distinctions at the expense of general well-being" -Google

WHY TWO DEFINITIONS?
This word could mean a few different things depending on how you use it, so I'm going to leave it up to you to find out which definition you want to use.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. alliance coalition of countries that opposed the Allied powers in World War II 2. Axis to subdue and limit the freedoms of pe
nevsk [136]

1. alliance coalition of countries that opposed the Allied powers in World War II 2. Axis to subdue and limit the freedoms of people 3. dictator a close association of countries 4. economic collapse Italian Fascist party leader during World War II 5. fasces the financial panic and downfall of a country 6. fascism extreme totalitarian government run by a dictator and based on highly-emotional nationalism 7. Mussolini rods bound by straps, blade of an axe protrudes from the rods symbolizing unity and strength, used as a symbol for power and jurisdiction 8. suppress a sole ruler of a nation; often cruel and abusive


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider all of the information provided about the author, Ibn al-Athir. Do you think this author is biased? Why or why not?
icang [17]

It is not sure if Ibn al-Athir was of Arab or Curdish ethnicity, but it is agreed that he was one of the main writers and biographers of the Crusades Era, and one of the Great Historians of the Muslim World.

He was born in the Great Seljuq Empire, modern Turkey, and experienced all the wars and chaos brought by Franks in the Crusades, living in Mosul, Baghdad and Damascus, even travelling with Saladin through for a period.

So, despite for being one of the only authors of its time to show respect and admiration for some of the Frank´s qualities, his main work "The Complete History" (Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh"), that aims at telling his history of the world, has obvious bias in favour of the Muslim cause.

Which can be observed in his accounts of the death of the Christian ruler of Tyre, in a way that could not be written by modern historians:

"In this year, on 13 rabi II, the Frankish Marquis, the ruler of Tyre-- God [email protected] him!-- was killed. He was the greatest devil of all the Franks."


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GIVING BRAINLIEST -40 points-
Mademuasel [1]

Answer:

C and D

Explanation:

they are the only 2 that make sense

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which reformer worked for women's rights during the Seneca Fells Convention?
masha68 [24]

Answer:

Seneca Falls Convention Organizers

Explanation:

Hope this Helps!!!

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What kinds of weapons (list 3) did the soldiers use in the Civil War?
    5·2 answers
  • How did England acquire the Dutch colony that separated its other colonies?
    11·2 answers
  • What do the lions stand for
    15·1 answer
  • One of wilson's major goals at the paris peace conference was to
    13·1 answer
  • The Food and Nutrition Service is part of _____.
    10·2 answers
  • What did the mayans <br> and the egyptians have in common
    6·1 answer
  • NO VIS AND PLEASE HELP ASAP!
    7·2 answers
  • The method of ending debate in the Senate is:
    6·2 answers
  • Why did the government view Malcolm x as a problem
    12·1 answer
  • List THREE facts about Ellis Island
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!