The only correct statement is: The literature of the Americas reflects the diversity of the people and cultures in each region.
It is not a homogenous literature, as those regions have had very different and diverse histories, social contexts, preoccupations. The North American literature developed during 18th and 19th centuries already, whereas the South American literature achieved world fame in the 20th century, especially with the advance of the so-called "magic realism" as its staple.
I believe the correct answer is: It reminds readers of the
loneliness and absolute desolation of the characters.
The novel “Frankenstein” (also known as “The Modern
Prometheus”), written by English author Mary Shelley, may serve as an accurate
example of (Dark) Romanticism, and therefore displays the most common
characteristics. One of this characteristics is the nature mirroring the
internal state of characters, which is why the choice of frozen landscapes such
as the North Pole and the Swiss Alps as settings in Frankenstein have an effect
that reminds people of the loneliness and absolute desolation of characters.
While reading the novel, you’ll notice that Victor always
goes to cold and desolated places when he feels troubled and lonely. It is also
a place where he isolates himself from his friends and family to prevent them
from becoming the victims of his creation. This is the state in which he feels
most desolated and according to that, the nature he surrounds himself with
mirrors that.
Answer:
<em> </em>
<em>State power is widely thought to be coercive. The view that governments must wield force or that their power is necessarily coercive is widespread in contemporary political thought. John Rawls is representative in claiming that (political power is always coercive power backed up by the government(s use of sanctions, for government alone has the authority to use force in upholding its laws.( This belief in the centrality of coercion and force plays an important but not well appreciated role in contemporary political thought. I wish to challenge this belief and the considerations that motivate it. States are not necessarily coercive or coercive (by definition.( Their claimed authority is prior to the force they wield. Legitimate states should need to resort to coercion and force much less than other states, and that fact seems unappreciated in contemporary political thought.Explanation:</em>
<em>Carry</em><em> </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>learning</em>
Answer:
probably the mass of dung
Explanation:
he's treated like waste
