None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
The appropriate response is Continuous reinforcement. At the point when a life form gets a reinforcer each time it shows a conduct. In halfway support, additionally alluded to as irregular fortification, the individual or creature does not get strengthened each time they play out the coveted conduct.
Language is just a concept created by humans. We have the ability to mimic almost any sound with our vocal cords, yet we do it in such a way that we understand one another. What if we just created one universal language, therefore ridding all others?
Answer:
They are important. they prevent one section of gov from taking all the power.
Explanation:
Architect is civil engineer course. Architect evolution year by year growing.modern architect is very useful important
