They are similar because the bill of rights was not obligatory when it was made, the states didn't have to abide by it yet because the supreme court didn't decide so. The Arizona Article II was similar to it to make sure the state abides by it. They are different for the simple reason that there are parts that are not based on the bill of rights, like the bill of rights has things not found in it, but the essence is the same.
Let's examine each possible answer:
A.
This is called the Commerce Clause, so this is true.
B.
<span>McCulloch v. Maryland ruled that Maryland (a state) may not tax the national government. So B is false.
C.
</span><span>Tax exemption is real and allows places like schools and churches to apply to be exempt from paying taxes. So C is true.
</span>
D.
This is true since state powers overrule local powers so cities may only make laws that don't interfere with state or federal laws.
So the answer is <span>B. States are allowed to tax the federal government, according to the Supreme Court ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819.</span>
The answer would be C. The French and Indian War left Great Britain in debt
Because children who worked at the time of the industrial revolution generally would not have been able to access a formal education, it could be rather good, in the hypotetical case that I have the irremediable luck of having to work to live and help my family, to have access to an artisan work that develops skills to face the future, such as carpentry, plumbing or masonry. Even if I was forced to do the most basic jobs, I could learn a lot from the older ones who did the most important jobs. Very soon I would have been able to seek my independence and to stand on my own with the skills learned.
