Do you think that U.S. imperialism was more beneficial or harmful to Latin American people? Explain.

1 answer:

3 0

<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that it was overall more beneficial since it kept out European invaders. </span>

You might be interested in

What were the protesting students ""Battle Cry?"" of vietnam war protest

SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

“Hey, hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”

Explanation:

The battle cry of students protesting against the Vietnam war was “Hey, hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”

8 0

3 years ago

What did Captain Lewis propose to the Minnetares?A) That they trade horses, B) That they encamp together near the river, C) That

krek1111 [17]

I think the answer to this is A

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In many cases, why did slaves

Bond [772]

C. They had nowhere to go

Many slaves wanted to run away but they had nowhere to go.

8 0

3 years ago

Percentage of US Homes with Electricity A bar graph titled Percentage of U S Homes with Electricity. The x axis shows the years

kykrilka [37]

Answer:

The answer to this question is given below in the explanation section

Explanation:

In this question, a scenario is given about inferencing information from the given data. The data that is given in the question about the percentage of US Homes with Electricity and it is depicted in the bar-graph as attached to this solution.

In this scenario, Which statement is supported by the information presented in the chart?

People owned fewer electrical appliances in the 1920s than in earlier decades.

More rural homes than urban homes had access to electricity in the 1920s. The number of houses with electricity would decrease after the 1930s.

Demand for electricity increased in the 1920s and 1930s.

The correct answer to this question is 3, that is the demand for electricity increased in the 1920s and 1930s in rural and urban.