1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jok3333 [9.3K]
3 years ago
11

Recently there has been major controversy over

History
2 answers:
slamgirl [31]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include the inscription to know what you are referring to.

However, doing some research we can comment on the following.

If the inscription refers to the Anderson Division of Hills Corps of the Florida Infantry, then our comment would be the following.

this inscription be

This inscription might be considered "controversial" by a number of Americans because it only refers to the 1st Florida Infantry Regiment that was formed by the Confederate state of Florida in times of the Civil War. Along with the 3rd Regiment, they fought in Tennesse as part of the battles fought in the American Civil War.

The inscription does not consider the black soldiers of the Union Army that were also killed in the battle site, so that is why people, in this tumultuous times of change, consider the inscription controversial.

Mumz [18]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation

Explanation:

It has been noted that over seven southern states in the US have passed laws to makes it difficult for people to remove statues considered to be confederate monuments. Protesters and public officials have made different attempts to remove these public objects that have been perceived to be symbols of Racism in the United States of America.

The issue is an aftermath of the civil war that happened in the United State in 1861 after several decades of tensions that happened between the southern and northern states over the rights of states, slavery and the westward expansion.  

You might be interested in
The industrial revolution began in the 18 century because of new technological inventions in agriculture how did this change aff
snow_lady [41]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can answer the following.

The Industrial Revolution began in the 18th century because of new technological inventions in agriculture. This change affected or changed the economic systems of Europe and the United States in that the Industrial Revolution impacted and transformed the way goods were produced. From an artisanal hand-made elaboration of products to mass production in the factories of Europe and the United States.

The Industrial Revolution changed the life of many people on both continents.

Technology in agriculture made mane farmers without a job and they decided to leave the rural areas to emigrate to the large cities where the factories and industries were established. There, factory owers needed hands to operate the machines of mass production. Those were low-paid jobs under unhealthy labor conditions, but people in need had to accept those jobs.

5 0
3 years ago
Which event in history is seen by many people as the beginning of the Great Depression?
stepan [7]
The great depression in 1929 is widely accredited to have been started by the Wall street crash, the drastic and fast fall in stock prices on the US stock market.
7 0
3 years ago
In which of the following instances would the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction?
SpyIntel [72]
The answer is D. One state sues another state.
7 0
3 years ago
What term references a period of economic growth as measured by a rise in gdp
muminat
The term that references a period of economic growth as measured by a rise in GDP is an economic expansion. It is the increase in economic activity.
7 0
3 years ago
What does immoral mean to you
White raven [17]
Immoral means<span> not moral and connotes evil or licentious behavior. Amoral, nonmoral, and unmoral, virtually synonymous although the first is by far the most common form, </span>mean<span> utterly lacking in morals (either good or bad), neither moral nor </span>immoral<span>.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "the terrorists who attacked the world trade center and the pentagon on 9/11 were members of ____, a group led by osama bin lade
    9·1 answer
  • When did the untied states take its first census
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following kingdoms was not located in West Africa?
    8·2 answers
  • Which king is accurately described by these statements?
    11·2 answers
  • A person who can afford a monthly payment of
    13·2 answers
  • The military alliance including the united kingdom, france, and the united states that was formed to protect european countries
    15·1 answer
  • In Roosevelt’s Inaugural Address, what was Roosevelt asking of the America people and why?
    8·1 answer
  • World War 1 was started when a _____ group assassinated the Austro-Hungarian heir to the throne.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of the Mongol Empire's conquest of the Song Dynasty: HINT - CHOOSE FOUR.
    6·1 answer
  • Which key ideas and details from the graphic organizer best illustrate Madison’s perspective?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!