1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
4 years ago
5

Why do you think different theorists have defined intelligence in different ways?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Travka [436]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The best answer to this question would be, that the reason is that theorists have varying views on the source of human intelligence, as well as how it develops, when it develops, and what are the causes for the development of human intelligence, as well as what stimulates it.

Although generally most people believe that intelligence comes from having a brain, and thus some believe that it has a genetic, or biological component to it, the truth is that although organically this may be true, intelligence cannot be simply explained through biology and genetics.

Theorists have thus focused on research about when, how, and why intelligence forms in human beings and what causes this, and drives this. Also, researchers have observed that different people may display different types of intelligence, instead of just one kind, something that cannot be explained simply through biology, or genetics, as basically all humans have the same organ.

Thus, researchers have gone on to focus on the causes of the development of intelligence, the sources of development, and what characterizes the different types of human intelligence.

You might be interested in
One reason college campuses are great places to be is because they are loaded with services designed to help students succeed, a
luda_lava [24]
Reasons such as:

- education quality
- learning
- team workmanship
- job opportunities
- community service


please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
4 0
4 years ago
What type of argument has the feature that if the premises are true the conclusion is certain to be true?
skelet666 [1.2K]

sound argument  has the feature that if the premises are true the conclusion is certain to be true.

A true conclusion is necessary for a good argument. TRUE: A sound argument has all true premises and is valid. As long as all of the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true, which is how a logical argument works.

A statement in an argument known as a premise serves as justification or support for the conclusion. An argument may contain one or more premises. In an argument, a conclusion is a declaration that summarizes the main points the arguer is attempting to persuade the reader or listener of. What does the argument seek to demonstrate?

To learn more about sound argument here

brainly.com/question/1327853

#SPJ4

3 0
2 years ago
What organizational method for persuasive speeches is designed to take the audience through the five steps of attention, need, s
Nitella [24]

Answer:

Monroe's Motivated Sequence.

Explanation:

Alan H. Monroe's <em>motivated sequence</em> is one of the most discussed organizational method for persuasive speeches. Its main purpose is to help speakers give <em>sequence to supporting material in an organized fashion. </em>

There are 5 steps:

  1. Attention: making the audience want to listen.
  2. Need: something needs to be done to solve the problem.
  3. Satisfaction: solution, satisfying the need.
  4. Visualization: picturing the results of this.
  5. Action: taking action.
3 0
3 years ago
Bev likes to be up late at night and sleep in; caleb likes to wake up with the sun and go to bed early. a psychologist would say
bagirrra123 [75]

The right choice is:


chronotypes


Completing the sentence:


Bev likes to be up late at night and sleep in. Caleb likes to wake up with the sun and go to bed early. A psychologist would say they have different chronotypes.


Indeed they have different chronotypes. Bev likes to be up late at night while Caleb does go to bed early and wakes up early.

3 0
3 years ago
In many nations, criminal law does not apply to corporations, but in the United Stated today, a corporation commits a crime when
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

The Correct Option is A

Explanation:

Option A: A Corporate "commits", when one employee "commits".., if the employee "acted" This show a correct logical flow.

Option B: The "committing" a crime....and the "committed" used for its employee shows a mismatch in tense even though they are simultaneous action so this option is wrong

Option C: "Corporations" commit a crime...How many corporations are committing a crime at a time here. This is already faulty and hence wrong

Option D: This is totally a blunder in logical flow.

Option E: word repetition and a mismatch of tenses almost everywhere in the sentence.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some factors that affect the supply output of goods?
    5·1 answer
  • Why might new Orleans prosper after the Louisiana purchase
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a major change in politics during the progressive era?
    13·1 answer
  • If Cynthia, an African American woman, earns an advanced degree, she may earn a similar income to Marie, a white woman with the
    9·1 answer
  • Fourteen-year-old aisha spends at least two hours per night talking to her best friend, kylie, on the phone. they often go over
    13·1 answer
  • Why did wealthy people in Mexico oppose president Benito Juarez
    5·1 answer
  • What is one major cultural similarity between China and Taiwan?
    5·2 answers
  • ________ is a form of education that promotes social responsibility and service to the community.
    10·1 answer
  • Dr. zawilinski is writing a program evaluation report, but she became distracted between her many projects and lost track of her
    6·1 answer
  • What organization claimed to be behind the september 11 terrorist attack? the palestinian liberation organization al-qaeda the t
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!