1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vivado [14]
3 years ago
11

Using preamble in a sentence that helps explain it meaning

History
1 answer:
shepuryov [24]3 years ago
4 0
The preamble of the constitution was a introduction to the Constitution's<span> fundamental purposes and guiding principles.</span>
You might be interested in
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question below using complete sentences. Scroll down to view the additional
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Onate sent his nephew and a few other men to go to Acoma Pueblo. When they got there, Onate's nephew named Zaldivar was killed, along with most of the other men that he had with him. ... Men over the age of 25 had to have there right foot cut off, and 25 years of slavery.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the structure of the Articles of Confederation support states' rights?
bazaltina [42]

It's between A and B. The articles of confederation made the federal government weak and pretty much non-existent in terms of true power. Effectively each state was its own country more or less.

I think A and B sound pretty identical though perhaps choice A isn't the best answer because each state didn't really think about the country as a whole, but rather focused on their own backyard.

<h3>So that's why I'm thinking the final answer is choice B</h3>

Though I would get a second opinion on the matter.

5 0
3 years ago
Write your 500-word, narrative-style legend of a Native American tribe of your choosing here.
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

The Cherokee were the mountaineers of the South, holding the entire Allegheny region from the interlocking head-streams of the Kanawha and Tennessee southward almost to the site of Atlanta, and from the Blue Ridge on the east to the Cumberland range on the west, a territory comprising an area of about 40,000 square miles, now included in the states of Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama. Their principal towns were upon the headwaters of the Savannah, Hiwassee, and Tuckasegee, and along the whole length of Little Tennessee to its junction with the mainstream. Itsâtĭ, or Echota, on the south bank of Little Tennessee, a few miles above the mouth of Tellico River, in Tennessee, was commonly considered the capital of the Nation. As the advancing whites pressed upon them from the east and northeast the more exposed towns were destroyed or abandoned and new settlements were formed lower down Tennessee and on the upper branches of the Chattahoochee and the Coosa.

As is always the case with tribal geography, there were no fixed boundaries, and on every side, the Cherokee frontiers were contested by rival claimants. In Virginia, there is reason to believe, the tribe was held in check in the early days by the Powhatan and the Monacan. On the east and southeast, the Tuscarora and Catawba were their inveterate enemies, with hardly even a momentary truce within the historic period; and evidence goes to show that the Sara or Cheraw was full as hostile. On the south, there was hereditary war with the Creeks, who claimed nearly the whole of upper Georgia as theirs by original possession, but who were being gradually pressed down toward the Gulf until, through the mediation of the United States, a treaty was finally made fixing the boundary between the two tribes along a line running about due west from the mouth of Broad River on the Savannah. Toward the west, the Chickasaw on the lower Tennessee and the Shawano on the Cumberland repeatedly turned back the tide of Cherokee invasion from the rich central valleys, while the powerful Iroquois in the far north set up an almost unchallenged claim of paramount lordship from the Ottawa river of Canada southward at least to the Kentucky River. On the other hand, by their defeat of the Creeks and expulsion of the Shawano, the Cherokee made good the claim which they asserted to all the lands from upper Georgia to the Ohio River, including the rich hunting grounds of Kentucky. Holding as they did the great mountain barrier between the English settlements on the coast and the French or Spanish garrisons along the Mississippi and Ohio, their geographic position, no less than their superior number, would have given them the balance of power in the South but for looseness of tribal organization in striking contrast to the compactness of the Iroquois league, by which for more than a century the French power was held in check in the north. The English, indeed, found it convenient to recognize certain chiefs as supreme in the tribe, but the only real attempt to weld the whole Cherokee Nation into a political unit was that made by the French agent, Priber, about 1736, which failed from its premature discovery by the English. We frequently find their kingdom divided against itself, their very number preventing unity of action, while still giving them importance above that of neighboring tribes.

Explanation:

this is 571 words. hope this helped you.

6 0
3 years ago
'1 why British India decided to send<br>a mission to Bhutan?<br>​
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

Explanation:

The dispute on revenue of Ambari Falakata led to sending of a mission to Bhutan by the British Govt of India.

plz markas brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
Did the government break the Native's culture? <br><br> Why or Why not?
miskamm [114]

Answer:

Yes. The governent broke natives culture

Explanation:

Native Americans have always been full with culture. Their hair, makeup, clothing, braclets and ect. have always been apart of their culture. The native americans have been beaten, raped, killed, and hurt in any possible way. This is the first Genocide and Racism/descrimination in america. But even Through all of that Native americans held on to their soul, heart, tribes, and culture. However, The Dawes Act

Between 1887 and 1933, US government policy aimed to assimilate Indians into mainstream American society. The Dawes Act also promised US citizenship to Native Americans who took advantage of the allotment policy and 'adopted the habits of civilized life. Nowdays the goverment gave money to the native american tribes for being misstreated. The U.S. government has agreed to pay a total of $492 million to 17 American Indian tribes for mismanaging natural resources and other tribal assets, according to an attorney who filed most of the suits. Also people who are 100 or 50% native american get cards that means no goverment or police fbi or anything can harm them or step foot on their property. but also these days native american women are being taken. INCONCLUSION yes it did change native lifes

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Modern Devotion?
    5·2 answers
  • What prompted Britain to colonize Singapore and Burma?
    15·1 answer
  • in 1919,the U.S Senate refused to ratify the treaty of Versailles and join the league of nations.Their main objection to joining
    7·2 answers
  • What defines a hominid
    8·1 answer
  • 2. Simon of Cyrene was just a normal guy who happened to be in Jerusalem. What role did
    14·1 answer
  • Does las Casas believe the Spaniard’s actions to be in accordance with the beliefs of Christianity?
    10·1 answer
  • How did China's early civilization differ from other river valley civilizations?
    12·2 answers
  • Please help it is for history if you get it right I will make you brainlist! If you post links or viruses I will report you! Ple
    11·1 answer
  • Heyyyyyy how is yall
    5·1 answer
  • In the final version of the Constitution which of the following phrases made it into the preamble towards the constitution's pur
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!