Shakespeare's plays are all about questioning authority: kings are deposed; bad people (Iago) triump over good ones (Cassio); your parents don't always know best (the behaviour of the parents in Romeo and Juliet is the cause of all the trouble).
In the Middle Ages people had a general sense that God was in his heaven, and all was right with the world. In the Renaissance people started to ask if that was true.
Shakespeare is always asking difficult questions, which is a very Renaissance thing to do. And he never makes any direct reference to Christian faith in any of his plays:- religious doubt was also a very Renaissance characteristic.
The German Empire and Austria-Hungary were Allied within the Central Powers, So I assume it was the German Empire in this case, Which Declared war on Russia and France and was at war with Britain due to the Invasion of Belgium.
So the Answer is the German Empire.
<span>The circumstances surrounding the event </span>
Answer:
Sherman Antitrust Act
Explanation:
Sherman Antitrust Act was given the approval on June 2, 1890. It was passed to maintain a lawful scenario in the businesses. The members of Congress anticipated in the formulation of the law in order to provide a regulation to the interstate commerce. It was a law that stressed upon preventing the emergence of monopolistic economy. The monopolistic trade was turned to be illegal. Any trust that would interfere with the working of the free trade was made illegal.
President Lincoln learned that to recreate the Union, servility must end. Politically, Lincoln faced constrain on all sides: from African Americans fleeing servility, from Union generals acting self-reliant, from extreme Republicans calling for instant abolition, and from pro-slavery Unionists who opposed emancipation. commanding a balance, he trust the president only had the authority and political support to free enslaved the people residing within the eleven rebel states. In the summer of 1862, he began to draft the Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln constantly implicit his critics that he had no ambition for rescinding the proclamation. He frequent his fidelity to emancipation in this note to Henry C. Wright of the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society. In 1864, he would risk his political fortunes and his reelection by throwing his full advocate behind the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which abrogate slavery.
