Answer:
Marketing and distribution of a variety of products
Explanation:
Marketing refers to a business function whereby a marketer advertises and promotes goods and services with an objective to increase sales and at the same time ensure customer satisfaction. Marketing mix refers to essential marketing components for effective marketing.
Marketing mix comprises of product, place, price and promotion.
Distribution refers to activities which are aimed at making products available in the right markets at the right time and utilizes various channels of distributions such as retailers, wholesalers, intermediaries, etc.
In the given case, Starbucks, the renowned coffee maker, has formed alliances or collaborations so as to extend and strengthen their business. These strategic alliances help Starbucks create an effective distribution network and wide-reach marketing which subsequently helps in efficient operations and profitability.
Answer:
Cash received from customers is $90,025 million
Cash paid to suppliers is $72,128 million
Explanation:
Cash received from customers is the net sales of $91,758 million minus the increase in accounts receivable since that is the portion of revenue yet to be received.
cash received from customers=$91,758 million-$1,733 million=$90,025 million
cash paid to suppliers is the cost of goods sold of $69,278 million plus the increase in inventory as well as the increase in accounts payable
cash paid to suppliers=$69,278 million+$883 million+$1,967 million=$72,128 million
Answer:
communicating with persons outside of the organization
drafting, laying out, and specifying technical devices, parts, and equipment
making decisions and solving problems
thinking creatively
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
