1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natta225 [31]
3 years ago
14

What were the economic consequences of apartheid in South Africa? Select three responses. Black citizens had a very low standard

of living. Wages remained low for most white citizens. Black citizens could not own private property. The economy had a stagnant growth rate. The government had a low level of debt.
History
1 answer:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The correct answers are:

A), C), and D).

Explanation:

Blacks in SouthAfrica were suppressed solely based on their colour. It was very difficult for black South Africans to own a landed property, get quality education, and land good jobs. In contrast, the government at that time intentionally worked to ensure that the economic standing of poorer whites improved.

According to research put forward by Terence Moll, "<em>the apartheid economy</em> failed." His work demonstrates that state of apartheid in South Africa created and perpetuated poverty over most of its history.

Cheers!

 

You might be interested in
Need help? Some one plis
Usimov [2.4K]
A comet (no problem)
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
T does not seem to me that the Jewish people can be the cause of this general epidemic throughout the whole world, as many sugge
Nataly [62]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

“It does not seem to me that the Jewish people can be the cause of this general epidemic throughout the whole world, as many suggest. My reasoning is as follows.

First, it is well-known that in most places where the Jewish people dwelled, they died in droves from the exact same disease as the Christians. If they really caused the epidemic, they would not have killed themselves and others of their faith.

Second, many people say that the Jews poisoned the wells, causing the disease. This also seems doubtful, because after the wells full of polluted water had been purified, the people still died in great numbers. Further, in cities that use water only from great rivers like the Danube, the inhabitants have also died in large numbers.

Moreover, even after all the Jews in many places had been killed and were completely driven out for nearly two years prior, the disease now strikes these same places just as powerfully as before.”

Conrad of Megenberg, German philosopher and theologian educated at the University of Paris, Concerning the Mortality in Germany, book written in Latin, 1350

a) Describe the historical situation in which Conrad of Megenberg wrote his book.

b) Describe ONE argument that Conrad of Megenberg makes regarding the Jewish people and the spread of disease.

c) Describe ONE way in which the disease referred to in the passage influenced the development of urban areas in the period 1350–1450.

Answer and Explanation:

a. Conrad is referring to the proliferation of the black plague in Europe. The black plague was a very violent epidemic that managed to cause many deaths in all European countries. People had no idea where this disease had been generated and many blamed the Jews for having generated and spread the disease, which caused much persecution to these people, murders and expulsions.

B. Conrad shows that the idea that the Jews caused the disease was very unrealistic, since they too were being affected by the disease and no one would kill himself and his own people. In other words, he claims that the Jews were not the culprits.

c. The black plague caused many deaths. Some countries have even had 50% or more of their population killed by the disease. This caused a decrease in the population of cities and rural centers, however. However, it was possible to see a vast rural exodus towards the urban centers of people looking for better ways of life.

7 0
3 years ago
What were some reasons that Texas wanted to become part of the US?
Aleks [24]

Answer:

Raising money was difficult for a small, new country.

Texas needed help defending its borders against continued attacks by Mexico.

Explanation:

Some of the reasons that Texas wanted to become part of the US was for financial help and stability because raising money for them at the time was difficult.

Another reason was for security: They needed a stronger force to protect them against the attacks of the Mexicans which came almost incessantly.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Are there any reasons to argue Augustus was a bad leader?
Tresset [83]

Answer:

Explanation:

Augustus though was Rome's MOST successful leader during his time period. Augustus during his time as leader brought peace among the romans and brought prosperity, though I would consider him a bad leader because he had to kill to gain power and become a Emperor other than that Augustus was never a bad leader he brought everything good about the Romans besides the killing of Julius Caesar.  

5 0
2 years ago
How did France punish the United states for signing Jay's Treaty with Britain?
larisa86 [58]
How did France punish the United States for signing Treaty with Britain?


Correct Answer: Seized American cargo ships 
             Good luck! :)
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This compromise ended military occupation of Northern troops in the South, led to Rutherford B. Hayes election and ultimately le
    8·1 answer
  • Which waterways are considered important for trade in southwest asia?
    6·1 answer
  • (25 pts)
    8·1 answer
  • A ____ is a form of government in which the leader is not a monarch and certain citizens have the right to vote.
    14·1 answer
  • 7. What did the British blockade of the North Sea contribute to?​
    14·1 answer
  • In what ways were the lives of the U.S. cowboy, the Mexican vacquero, and the Argentine gaucho similar? Compare the popular myth
    10·1 answer
  • Rasputin had influence over government decisions when he was close to the Czar's family. How does this support the claim that th
    8·1 answer
  • 15.
    8·1 answer
  • Based on this expert what can you conclude about the Inca government
    6·1 answer
  • Where did the Renaissance begin?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!