Answer:
Annie should increase the order size to 148 bottles per order and she will be able to save $91.85 per year.
Explanation:
we must calculate the economic order quantity (EOQ) in order to determine the size of the order that reduces costs:
EOQ = √[(2 x S x D) / H]
- S = cost per order = $35
- D = annual demand = 2,500 bottles of shampoo
- H = holding cost per unit) = $8
EOQ = √[(2 x 35 x 2,500) / 8] = √(175,000 / 8) = √21,875 = 147.90 ≈ 148 bottles of shampoo
total cost when ordering 100 bottles = (25 orders x $35) + (100/2 x $8) = $875 + $400 = $1,275
total cost when ordering 148 bottles = (16.89 orders x $35) + (148/2 x $8) = $591.15 + $592 = $1,183.15
Annie will save $1,275 - $1,183.15 = $91.85 per year
Answer:
I would have to say, C Supply is how much of an item you have and demand is how much demand you have
I think it’s a consignment loan.
Answer: B. Firm and competitor
Explanation: Rashi Glazer is of the opinion that information-intensive markets otherwise known as smart markets are breaking down traditional boundaries, thereby blurring the lines between product offerings, departments, and the firm with its external world, competitors inclusive. For firms deciding to follow the approach to technological advancement while leaving the stability of what already exists often place them at risks since these advancements are by nature risky. Choosing not to either places them at a disadvantage to those firms who decide to and are successful.
True
A source’s objectivity and bias is a key consideration when evaluating the objectivity of sources. It is vital that sources used are credible hence the need to ensure that they are objective. As such, a biased source should not be used.
