Answer:
to protect people from the vauras
Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.
The word prodigy applies to Waverly due to her being especially good at chess, or whatever it was she does. Her mother's point of view on prodigy is being the best she can be, and the term applies to her mother by not being quite as smart as her daughter.
Hello. You did not provide the texts to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
A supreme court decision is only fair if it is in accordance with the laws defended by the federal constitution and if it promotes greater good, peace and social harmony. The supreme court must always act justly and therefore, its decisions must always follow the law in force in the country. If the laws are complied with, the decision is fair, even if it does not seem and it benefits a guilty individual.
Option A contains you fragment, the second scentence does not contain a noun.
