Answer:
dyads
Explanation:
A dyad is a kind of group that ceases to exist if even one member of leaves the group.
Such groups consists usually of two people.
- A dyad is used in sociology to refer to a group of two people
- It can be a brother and a sister
- Such groups can be terminated when one member of the group pulls out or dies.
- Dyads are the simplest group structures known.
- Members of a dyad can be linked by education, romance, business, e.t.c
<span>In Isaiah 38:1-6, the Lord promised
Hezekiah through Isaiah deliverance from the Assyrians. Then the word of the
Lord came to Isaiah: 5 “Go and tell Hezekiah, ‘this is what the Lord, the God
of your father David, says: I have heard your prayer and seen your tears; I
will add fifteen years to your life. 6 And I will deliver you and this city
from the hand of the king of Assyria. I will defend this city.</span>
Answer:
Mr Gonzalez has significantly raised the cognitive level at which his students are working by the use of the following techniques:
- Music
- whiteboards and marker pads
- Writing words and explaining the meaning.
Explanation:
Many of the techniques Mr Gonzalez used are visual and auditory.
Music appeals to our hearing whilst whiteboard and marker pads are Visual.
Some students are aural (Music/Auditory), others are visual (spatially inclined), some are kinesthetic (physical). Other types of learning inclinations are:
Logical learners, solitary learners, social learners.
By writing the words and explaining the meaning, Mr Gonzalez was also reaching out to those where are logical.
Thus by using a wide range of teaching techniques (Aural, Logical, Logical) Mr Gonzalez increased the rate of perception and assimilation of his students.
Cheers!
The question below, the Miranda v. Arizona outcome answer is "Should legal counsel always be appointed by the court, or should the citizen accused of a crime have the right to choose the attorney he would like to represent him?"
<u>Answer:</u> Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
The U.S. Supreme Court's turning point resolution was resulted from "Miranda v. Arizona" case in which the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution inhibits prosecutors from using comments made by an individual in reaction to police custody questioning as witnesses in their case unless they can prove that the person was advised of the right to contact an attorney both before and during inquiry. Some deemed Miranda a drastic shift in US criminal law.
