the ratio of analysis to evidence is analysis/ratio it is always the analysis before the evidence
What is supposed to be answered?
The conclusion is that in the end the park will be built even tough it is not in everybody's agenda. Some people, following Samara's proposal, are convinced of the benefits that the park would bring and work towards its construction, trying to share their point of view with other members of the community. The fact is that no one is actually against the park, parties who do not explicitly support it are just indiferent.
Therefore, there will be no opposition but only preassure made by park supporters so it will be built.
C. If they know you don't care then its less likely that critics will criticize your persuasive argument, or D will also work
Answer:
B
Explanation:
<h3>Because if a singer is repeating words in a song he is like tryna get an important message across</h3>
