Which of the following would not encourage population to experience exponential growth

History

2 answers:

Nikitich [7]2 years ago

3 0

The most likely one is D

velikii [3]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is D. A large-scale natural disaster wouldn't encourage population to experience exponential growth.

Explanation:

A natural disaster is caused by nature itself, not by man; therefore being difficult to stop. A natural disaster can be very devastating: it can cause widespread damage and kill many people. Examples of natural disasters are earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, fires or tsunamis among others.

Due to the high death rate that these disasters can produce (from hundreds to thousands of deaths is a common figure), natural disasters do not help the population growth of a given population.

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

1.Fredrick

2.Slave

3. Autobiography

3 0

3 years ago

Which factors contributed most to the settlement of California in the late 1840s and early 1850s

maxonik [38]

Answer:

the high demand for factory workers

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

HISTORY HELP 10 POINTS

Softa [21]

5+3=8 not 10 YOu need math

7 0

3 years ago

How does this map suggest that people modified the landscape?

saveliy_v [14]

Answer:

The red lines depicting railroads. The wood and coal showing utilized forests and coal mines

Explanation:

Source: That picture

8 0

3 years ago

What are reasons the Allied countries did not stand up for the aggression of Germany, Italy, and Japan

Troyanec [42]

Answer:

Explanation:

Tripartite Pact, agreement concluded by Germany, Italy, and Japan on September 27, 1940, one year after the start of World War II. It created a defense alliance between the countries and was largely intended to deter the United States from entering the conflict.

5 0

2 years ago