The answer is " B" as hybrid means a combination of two things.
Christians had to pay higher taxes than Muslims, for example, and they had very few political and legal rights.
In spite of these obstacles, the Armenian community thrived under Ottoman rule. They tended to be better educated and wealthier than their Turkish neighbors, who in turn grew to resent their success.
This resentment was compounded by suspicions that the Christian Armenians would be more loyal to Christian governments (that of the Russians, for example, who shared an unstable border with Turkey) than they were to the Ottoman caliphate.
These suspicions grew more acute as the Ottoman Empire crumbled. At the end of the 19th century, the despotic Turkish Sultan Abdul Hamid II – obsessed with loyalty above all, and infuriated by the nascent Armenian campaign to win basic civil rights – declared that he would solve the “Armenian question” once and for all.
“I will soon settle those Armenians,” he told a reporter in 1890. “I will give them a box on the ear which will make them…relinquish their revolutionary ambitions.”
Hope this helps
The framing of Native Americans as savages and the pervasiveness of lynching across the American South played central roles in the development of those regions because due to the constant resistant by the Native Americans the colonist make sure they find a way to make them conform to their demands and this brought about endless conflict and at last the end of Reconstruction.
<h3>What lead to conflicts to develop between Southern colonists and the Native Americans?</h3>
The Native Americans were said to have resented and also they did resist the colonists' ways to change them.
Note that their refusal to work in the ways of the European culture is said to have angered the colonists and hostilities was said to have broken out between the two groups that lea to fight and deaths..
Learn more about Native Americans from
brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ1
Answer:
Roosevelt made the case for what he called "the New Nationalism" in a speech in Osawatomie, Kansas, on September 1, 1910. The central issue he argued was government protection of human welfare and property rights, but he also argued that human welfare was more important than property rights.
Explanation:
hope this helps
