1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qwelly [4]
3 years ago
12

which muslim empire-the umayyads, the ottomans, or the moguls-treated the non-muslim subjects the most fairly? the least fairly?

History
1 answer:
VladimirAG [237]3 years ago
6 0

The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.


The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).

You might be interested in
The Wilmot Proviso...
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

the answer is

Explanation:

The Wilmot Proviso

B. Tried to ban slavery in the Mexican Cession.

*theres another question to this question so heres the answer*

What happened after the Wilmot Proviso was introduced in Congress?

B.It failed to become law.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following affirmed the legality of racial segregation and created the idea of separate but equal?
mafiozo [28]

Answer:

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In the prince, machiavelli suggests that a ruler should take care that the fear he inspires in his subjects does not turn to hat
coldgirl [10]

Machiavelli ensure that is more beneficial to be feared than loved. As this will not turn the fear into hate and the ruler can also control the state peacefully.

Every prince will want to be considered merciful, but mercy should not be mismanaged. No prince should mind being called cruel for keeping his subjects peaceful and loyal. Punishing a few, and thus averting disorder, is better than allowing troubles to develop that will hurt many. New rulers cannot avoid seeming cruel, because their states are insecure.

You cannot be both loved and feared, then it is better to be feared than loved. Men are generally fickle, afraid of danger, and greedy. A prince must be careful not to make him hated, even though he is feared; to do this, he must keep his hands off his subjects' property and their women. People will sooner forget the death of a father than the loss of an inheritance. However, when a prince commands an army, he must be cruel in order to control his troops. In conclusion, people love at their own wish, but fear at the prince's will, so a wise ruler will rely on what he can best control.

Continuing his discussion of virtues that are not virtues, Machiavelli considers mercy and cruelty. As with generosity and miserliness, he comes down on the side of the supposedly bad quality. He bases his judgment on consideration of what benefits the most people. It is no use to be merciful if by doing so, a prince allows disorder in his state to get out of control. A controlled amount of cruelty, which harms a few, can avert widespread violence and lawlessness, which harms many.

To learn more about Machiavelli here

brainly.com/question/15778425

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
What were the economic consequences of the civil war
patriot [66]
The north wanted the south to change its work gain, such as slavery and change more into industry
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Thomas Jefferson handle domestic and foreign affairs during his presidency
Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Domestically he implemented limitations of government, supported yeoman farmers and the growth of agriculture, and reduced military expenditures, but His greatest foreign policy success was the purchase of Louisiana from France in 1803.

After his successful reelection in 1804, Jefferson’s term became increasingly preoccupied with questions of foreign policy arising from the global war between Great Britain and Napoleonic France.

Explanation:

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-ushistory/chapter/the-jefferson-administration/#:~:text=Jefferson's%20presidency%20was%20marked%20by,Louisiana%20from%20France%20in%201803.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the Lingqu Canal built?
    10·2 answers
  • How is a unitary system of government different from a federal system of government?
    7·2 answers
  • The Pueblo IV people _______________ a. were Northern Anasazi who moved south. b. had architecture that was much better than tha
    11·1 answer
  • What event ultimately ended the civil war??
    5·2 answers
  • * PLEASE ANSWER * Mikhail Gorbachev, the General Secretary of the Communist Party and leader of the Soviet Union, was a refomer.
    13·1 answer
  • President Hoover and President Roosevelt had different responses to the Great Depression. Explain how these two presidents respo
    15·1 answer
  • The Populist Party wanted to base the nation’s currency on __________.
    11·1 answer
  • Nazis who forced Jewish people to live in ghettos also forced them to
    14·2 answers
  • John green "argues" that Word War II was fought as a response to...
    8·2 answers
  • 50 pts!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!