Answer:
Because their waters provided places to hunt and fish. Also, as the rivers flooded, the lands around them became fertile. This allowed them to support farming. This is especially true of the Nile River, which flooded the same time each year.
Explanation:
It segregated them from restrooms, restaurants, fountains, and public transportation. It also affected the way they can vote.
In the traumatic aftermath of World War One, many questioned whether man's civilization had revealed a dooming weakness, and if one of its greatest achievements—democracy—was only a fragile ideal. Did the war to make the world "safe for democracy" expose a world unfit for democracy? And what about America? For 130 years the republic had survived chronic growing pains and a murderous civil war, but was it, too, displaying signs of dissolution and rot? Voter apathy, corruption in city politics, the "tyranny of the fifty-one percent," the suppression of black voting in the South—American democracy seemed worn, cracked, and vulnerable.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
Answer:
In the South during the Antebellum period, the years between the late 1700s and the first half of the 1800s, what most differentiated the elite and the poor was the <u>land ownership (A)</u>.
Explanation:
The South during Antebellum was largely agricultural. Unlike northern states that were industrializing and creating many different jobs and specializations, the south focused its economic activities on agriculture.
Because of this land property was the main differentiation between classes, which means that this region was immensely unequal. Who had land formed the elite, and who hadn't was poor and had to work for the elite to survive.
Answer: it was the shortest naval route between Europe and Asia.
Explanation:
