Ratio and proportion is a useful method in determining a value using a known constant in ratio form. In this case, the ratio of cost to price is always 1/4. Hence, the solution goes as follows:
1/4 = 33.85/price
Price = 33.85*4
Price= $135.4
Matching each scenario to the insurance needed for protection.
- Tyrell's son has leukemia and will need cancer medications- Health insurance.
- Someone broke into Maria's house and stole her flat screen TV and other values- Homeowners insurance.
- Don wants to make sure his family has enough money to pay off the house if he dies- Life insurance.
- Jill broke both of her legs in a skiing accident. She will be out of work for several months while she recovers from her injuries- Disability insurance.
- Due to careless driving, Lisa hit another car and hurt the passengers inside- Liability insurance.
<h3>What is insurance?</h3>
Insurance can be defined as a coverage that help to cover cost or expenses in case of unforeseen or unexpected circumstances such as:
Therefore Tyrell's son has leukemia and will need cancer medications- Health insurance.
Learn more about insurance here:brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ1
The given values in the problem are enumerated below:
futa tax rate = 0.8%
suta tax rate = 5.4 %
Employee's fee = $7,100
Amount taxes = $7100 *(0.008+0.054)= $440.2
When an employee earned total wages of $9100, we can solve the unknown:
Employee's wages = $9100 + $440.2
Employee's wages = $ 9540.2
Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
