1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maksim [4K]
4 years ago
8

The principle of divides powers between state and national governments.

History
1 answer:
GarryVolchara [31]4 years ago
8 0

Explanation:

Federalism

Federalism is the system of government in which power is divided between a central government and regional governments; in the United States, both the national government and the state governments possess a large measure of sovereignty.

You might be interested in
Read this lines from "Harriet Tubman aka Moses.” You ain't stoppin now You can't stop now You gonna move A fearful B misundersto
fgiga [73]

Answer:

C persistent

Explanation:

I GOT IT RIGHT ON EDGE NO CAP

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Reagan based his reelection campaign in 1984 on getting people to vote early.his Supreme Court appointments.a booming economy.th
Vesna [10]

The correct answer is .a booming economy

President Reagan won the 1984 reelection by a huge landslide given that he won in 49 states out of 50 states. This was in the backdrop of a booming economy that made the electorate confident in his leadership. He received the highest electoral votes in the history of the country


7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Review the events that led directly to World war 1. Then compare and contrast them with the events that led directly to World wa
notka56 [123]

The primary events which led to the outbreak of World War II in Europe were German aggressive expansionary policies in Eastern Europe, primarily the invasion of Poland, which triggered the outbreak. A secondary cause was the reluctance of other European powers to stop German aggression before it erupted into a full blown war.

German Chancellor Adolf Hitler frequently railed against the perceived unfairness of the Treaty of Versailles of 1919, and withdrew Germany from the

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812: had no effect on the war was the final, decisive battle was a significant batt
Rina8888 [55]
Had no effect on the war I think because it was fought after the treaty was already signed. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the term used for a form of government that has a king or queen but also includes a statement of citizen rights and gove
    5·1 answer
  • American colonies were founded by:
    13·1 answer
  • What key events or features of civilizations enabled people to develop writing?
    10·1 answer
  • What were 2 major features that drew the heaviest<br><br> Criticism?
    12·1 answer
  • May someone please answer this for me? Thank you.
    10·1 answer
  • How was the egyptians education?​
    14·1 answer
  • ILL GIVE A HUNDRED
    7·1 answer
  • What phrase best completes the diagram
    6·1 answer
  • When and where was the congress of Viena?
    8·2 answers
  • One of these scholars relied heavily on evidence about the political process. Which scholar was that? What sort of evidence did
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!