I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Answer:
Law plays an essential part in regulation of science and technology and concerning of ethical consequences of scientific research along with modern technology.This field of law,science and technology attempt to systematically the diverse way in which law interacts with science and technology.
Explanation:
I hope it wil help you.Thanks for question.
Answer:
Hitler's invasion of Poland led to his dictatorship.
Hope that was correct.
Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, and Trump all used propaganda and fear mongering to emotionally and mentally manipulate supporters into giving them more power and discriminate and attack people with opposing views
