Because of Marie Antoinette I think
The bill of rights (1689) guaranteed parliamentary rights that needed to be respected by the monarchs. It meant, a constitutional monarchy, where the power of the monarchs was limited by the Bill of Rights that protected the authority of Parliament.
The south because they relied on trade
Thomas Hobbes’ nature was to create common sense and urge the colonist to break free form Britain’s control and the British had a monarchy so you get it
Ans: The calling of the Estates-General is different from the calling of Parliament by King Charles I of England in that the calling of the Estates-General in times of French King Louis XIV did not limit his powers of King, while in the case of the calling of Parliament by King Charles I of England, the Parliament indeed limited the powers of the monarch.
After King Philip XIV called for the Estates-General, the state was set to bring the French Revolution to a beginning. Indeed, Philip was the last monarch before the Revolution. Let's remember that he finished his days as a king when he died in the guillotine in 1793. In the case of King Charles I, he was tried and accused of high treason to England. He was executed in 1649.
