Answer:
d. It offers advantages to influence lawmakers
Explanation: protecting this correct answer post accomplished.
Answer:
B. They were wealthier than other peasants and therefore had the most to lose.
Explanation:
Explanation:
By 1917 in Russia emerged a wealthy and prosperous peasant class who was characterized by owning large farms and agricultural areas. They also had access to cattle and all types of agricultural business. They were so powerful that Kulaks even lent money and played an important social role in Russian society.
In 1927 the Soviet powers to be and political class started a change in the peasant policy in which it was necessary to have a more demanding tax policy on Kulaks and Kulaks also had to be restricted regarding their right to lease lands. Obviously it was a policy Kulak class was against for because such a policy represented the beginning of the "Collectivization" of agriculture so they pressed very hard to discourage this government new policy. In the end of 1929 the Soviet government successfully launched a campaign of "dekulakization" and approximately 75% of farms in the Soviet Union entered in the collectivization policy.
the first one and second one should be the answers
to me letter C best describes the role of Viceroys in Spain's American empire :)
hope this helps :)
Answer: The theme that this sentence suggests is that people are different and often disagree with each other.
Explanation:
This is an excerpt from a speech that Patrick Henry delivered to the Second Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775, at St. John's Church in Richmond. In the speech, he suggests that Virginians should support the Revolutionary War.
The lines above are from the very beginning of Henry's speech. In these lines, Henry argues that people are different and have different opinions. He hopes that man who disagree with him will not be offended by the ideas he is about to present in his speech. He does not attack those who do not support him, as it is not the right way to persuade people to agree with him. Quite the opposite: Henry shows respect for those people, and argues that good people often disagree.
