Henry Wallace's main argument, according to his letter, was that he says "<span>we are preparing ourselves to win the war which we regard as inevitable or we are trying to build up a predominance of force to intimidate the rest of mankind." He served as a former vice president and secretary of agriculture during his tenures.</span>
<span>Answer:
A general's win-loss record is only one thing to ponder upon. There are other factors. One is the competency of the opposition. So a lackluster general may fight an even worse general and end up looking good by winning. Weather may be a factor. A good general with a good plan may still lose because of bad weather. Good generals with good
plans may be defeated may be defeated
by an army with better weapons.
There's also reputation to consider.
Grant fought and won more than he
lost. Other generals still complained to
Lincoln about him saying he drank. Lincoln stayed with him saying he was needed because he fought. Lee may have been a better general than Grant but he did not have as many men and his men were poorly fed and supplies were inadequate.</span>
<span>Under the english westminster model the highest court of appeals is the "House of Lords," since this can actually be correlated (to a certain extent) with the Senate in the United States. </span>
