Answer:
<h2>German Samoan </h2>
Explanation:
<h2>Hope it will help you.</h2>
<span>With the enactment in 1903 of the Terrell Election Law, which was amended in 1905-1906, a statewide direct-primary system for all state, district, and county elective offices was established and made mandatory for all parties that had received as many as 100,000 votes in the previous election; the requirement was later ...</span><span>Jun 12, 2010</span>
Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
As the exercise introduces, when the Great Depression broke out, the American federal government had no programs in place to deal with homelessness and joblessness. This was due to the totally colapsing economy of the country; the economy shrank 50% and began doing so in August of 1929. When this started there was no help from the government, there was no money and, therefore, no initiative to put programs in place to deal with the lack of jobs and homelessness.
The changes that occurred to U.S. Law as a result of the Patriot Act were:
- It became easier for government agencies to spy on foreign citizens.
- It became easier for the government to stop certain financial transactions.
- It became easier for the government to deny us entry to certain individuals.
<h3>What happened as a result of the Patriot Act?
</h3>
The purpose of the Patriot Act was to protect Americans from another event like 9/11. To this end, it became easier for the government to spy on people to identify terrorist threats.
The government could also stop certain financial transactions and deny entry to certain individuals if they suspected any foul play related to terrorism.
Find out more on the Patriot Act at brainly.com/question/25741451.
