Answer:
I took the quiz and the correct answer was <u>D. It implies an expectation of success or money.</u>
To be honest, I'm not sure. You can go over it in class.
The best critique that should make Henrique to revise the paraphrase is Some descriptive language should be added by Henrique to make the story to be so alive.
<h3>What is the summary of the story?</h3>
The story of the story is to talk about the way the soldiers acted when they were made to face the dragon.
From the story, they were on a trip to face the dragon. But the story did not tell the complete details about the encounter.
<h3>Complete story</h3>
The soldiers walked through the rain as they approached the canyon. They'd been traveling for days to reach the dragon's lair. Finally they arrived. Then the dragon approached, and it roared. Yet, the soldiers faced off with the dragon, despite the noise.
Your Question: Which is the best critique explaining why Henrique should revise the summary?
Read more on excerpts here:
brainly.com/question/21400963
#SPJ1
If the tone is the poems rhime and rithm then the first poem is not bearing the relativity and the multitude of meanings encompassed in the second poem and, although the message of the first poem, due to the style the author chose, gets through sharply
Answer:
B “‘I won’t,’ said his friend doggedly. ‘I threw it on the fire. If you keep it, don’t blame me for what happens. Pitch it on the fire again, like a sensible man.’” ( Paragraph 42)
Explanation:
The question above is related to the story entitled "The Monkey's Paws." It is a supernatural story about<em> "three wishes,"</em> which can also be classified as a <em>horror story. </em>
Letter B supports the answer to PART A because it shows how that the soldier is warning Mr. White about the talisman. He said that it is best to throw it into the fire because it was causing<u> a lot of mischief</u>. However, Mr. White insisted that he'd take it. <u>The soldier then warned him not to blame him if something bad happens.</u> This shows how <em>Mr. White ignores the experience of the soldier </em>who already told him the <u>consequences</u> that may occur once the talisman is used.
So, this explains the answer.
