Which developments most led to changes in the level of presidential power during the 20th century?

History

2 answers:

4vir4ik [10]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The verified answer is wrong, I just did this on APEX and I used the verified one.

Explanation:

The correct answer would be "The expanded use of executive actions to combat economic crises"

kakasveta [241]3 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is D) Presidents' increasing willingness to veto any laws that raised taxes.

The development that most led to changes in the level of presidential power during the 20th century was the Presidents' increasing willingness to veto any laws that raised taxes.

Article II of the US Constitution states the powers of the United States President. Under the Constitution, the President can sign new legislation or can veto it. He can gran reprieves and pardons, he is the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, he is the Chief Diplomat of the country, receives ambassadors, and he can make foreign treaties. During the 20th century, the Presidents has increased willingness to veto any laws that raised taxes when he tries to protect the economy of the citizens and the welfare of the nation.

You might be interested in

Drag each tile to the correct box. Not all tiles will be used

hodyreva [135]

1. First Battle of Bull Run,
2. Battle of Antietam
3. Battle of Gettysburg
4. Sherman's March to the sea

3 0

2 years ago

Who likes twilight movies. I do.

mezya [45]

Answer:

I love them! Jake up or Edward?

Explanation:

I can't decide.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is ostracism a good way to limit power? Why or why not? What other ways might there be to limit the power of politicians?

tekilochka [14]

Answer:political practice in ancient Athens whereby a prominent citizen who threatened the stability of the state could be banished without bringing any charge against him. (A similar device existed at various times in Argos, Miletus, Syracuse, and Megara.)

Explanation: He remained owner of his property. Ostracism must be carefully distinguished from exile in the Roman sense, which involved loss of property and status and was for an indefinite period (generally for life).

4 0

3 years ago

In the Zimmerman note, Germany offered which of the following to Mexico

ki77a [65]

Answer: B.) The return of Mexican lands held by the United States.

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

How did King Phillip cause the Great Schism?

Gnesinka [82]

Best answer: by disagreeing with the pope

There had been much struggle between Pope Boniface VIII and the French king, Philip IV, over control of the church in France. Philip actually sent men to rough up Boniface during that time. After Boniface's death and then a papacy of less than a year by Benedict XI, pressure from France resulted in the electing of a French cardinal as Pope Clement V, in 1305. Clement moved the office of the papacy from Rome to Avignon, which was in Holy Roman Empire territory but near the border of France. The papal offices stayed in Avignon, under French domination, from 1309 to 1376, with seven popes total governing the church from there.

Gregory XI, the last French pope, returned the offices of the papacy to Rome in 1377. When Gregory XI died in 1378, an Italian again was elected to be pope – Urban VI. But very quickly many cardinals (especially the French) regretted the election of Urban VI. The French cardinals put forth their own rival pope, Clement VII, later in 1378. This began the Great Schism, also known as the Western Schism or Papal Schism. There were competing popes claiming the authority of that office and the allegiance of Catholics in Europe. The split in the papacy lasted till 1417.

7 0

3 years ago