1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
noname [10]
3 years ago
14

After World War 1, President Wilson went to Europe to help write the peace treaty that ended the War. Was he within his Constitu

tional powers when he negotiated a treaty?______ Where is it addressed in the Constitution?____( Article and Section) Did the treaty activate as soon as he signed it?_______Why or Why not?_____Where is it addressed?
History
1 answer:
pogonyaev3 years ago
5 0

<u>YES, President Wilson was within his Constitutional powers</u> when he negotiated terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which came at the end of World War I.   This power is assigned to the President in <u>Article II, Section 2</u> of the Constitution, which states, "The President shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties."  The advice and consent of the Senate typically comes after the treaty has been negotiated by the President.  As reported by <em>Justia </em>(a legal information site), "The Senate’s role in relation to treaties is essentially legislative in character."  In a Supreme Court decision in 1936, this was affirmed by the Court's decision, which said, that the President "alone negotiates. Into the field of negotiation, the Senate cannot intrude" (United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 1936).  

<u>NO, the treaty President Wilson negotiated did not activate as US policy as soon as he signed it.  The Senate refused to ratify the treaty</u>.  This is addressed also in <u>Article II, Section 2</u> of the Constitution, which gives the Senate the authority to confirm treaties negotiated by the President.  The full phrase in that section of the Constitution says of the President, "He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur."

<u>Details about the Senate's refusal of the Treaty of Versailles:</u>

The League of Nations was the signature idea of US President Woodrow Wilson.  He had laid out 14 Points for establishing and maintaining world peace following the Great War (World War I).  Point #14 was the establishment of an international peacekeeping association.

The Treaty of Versailles adopted the idea of forming such an international association, which became the League of Nations.  But back home in the United States, there was not support for involving America in any association that could diminish US sovereignty over its own affairs or involve the US again in wars beyond those pertinent to the United States' own national security. Because of its objections to membership in the League of Nations, the United States Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles.

You might be interested in
In the 1976 presidential election who won by a litte over 50 percent of the vote
madreJ [45]
Jimmy career became the u.s president in 1976.
8 0
3 years ago
In the beginning, why were the non white south africans helpless to end apartheid
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
Because they were not permitted to vote or have an office to hold for themselves. ANSWERS.COM
Hope this loves.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did american involvement in vietnam change under president johnson and nixon?
valkas [14]

Answer:

They tried getting more directly involved

Explanation:

LBJ wanted to send troops to Vietnam for one reason, the domino effect. This domino effect feared that if communism grows in a country in a specific region, then it will spill into other countries in that region. The domestic support for this war was terrible, even Sweden hated it so much that they supported the Vietcong. Nixon did support it for a bit, but he knew his administration will be very popular if he took the troops out and so he did.

6 0
3 years ago
Identify the beliefs of Protestants and the beliefs of Catholics. (Categorize)
ale4655 [162]

Here are the matches:

Roman Catholics:

  • Believed that meditation, prayer, and contemplation exercises strengthened one’s relationship with God .
  • Vowed absolute obedience to the pope.
  • Rejected the belief that people couldn’t receive  grace through good works.

Protestants:

  • Believed that faith alone could lead to salvation .
  • Viewed indulgences as a morally and economically corrupt practice .
  • Taught that the Bible was  the only source of Christian  spiritual teachings.

<u>Historical context:</u>

The Protestant Reformation is noted as beginning with Martin Luther's posting of what are commonly called "The 95 Theses."  The official title of Luther's document, which he put forth on October 31, 1517, as theses for debate, was: Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences.  Indulgences were papers issued by the authority of the pope that granted the person obtaining them the removal of penance owed in regard to their sins.  Luther objected not only to the fact that these papers were being peddled for money, but questioned many of the doctrinal foundations behind the use of indulgences.

As Luther continued his reform efforts, he protested not only indulgences, but the revering of relics, prayers to saints, the authority of the pope, and more.  Many of the long-standing Catholic Church traditions were challenged.  Other reformers, such as Ulrich Zwingli and John Calvin, also became part of the Protestant Reformation activity.

Luther and the other Protestant reformers proclaimed salvation as a gift of God's grace, rather than something earned by human efforts.  The Roman Catholic Church spoke of God's grace also, but as an enabling power that helped human beings do the works required for obtaining salvation.  The reformers still preached that we should do good works, but said those works were a fruit of being saved rather than a source of salvation.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is utilitarianism ​
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

Utilitarianism is a philosophical belief that supports the idea that happiness and pleasure is the ultimate thing to live for while not in support or agreement of harmful situations or policies.

In other words, Utilitarianism is a belief that supports society's values that are established on happiness.

It focuses on three main principles which are:

1. Happiness is the goal of all actions

2. Situation is right if it leads to

Happiness

3. All the people involved in a situation should experience Happiness.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When making a historical interpretation about event a historian require
    5·2 answers
  • whis fact is the BEST piece of supporting evidence that overproduction and falling of prices was a cause of the Great Depression
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement is true of the winter of 1777–1778?
    9·2 answers
  • When did the partisan press era take place? (5 points)
    10·2 answers
  • How did nativists treat immigrants in the late 1800s and early 1900s?
    14·2 answers
  • Do you think it is plausible that such an amendment could become part of the Constitution?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. The federal court system is
    13·1 answer
  • Suffrage is
    6·1 answer
  • What happened as a result of silphium being so popular fill in the blanks
    11·2 answers
  • TRUE / FALSE<br> New inventions that saved time helped people have more leisure time.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!