Answer:
One is buying a brand new T.V. then one can purchase the T.V. beneath the monopolistic market situation. this can be as a result of T.Vs are oversubscribed as differentiated product by diverse brands with diverse options in several brands of T.V. conjointly promotion and marketing also shows a vital part in T.V. market. though utterly viable variety of markets lead to lowest worth, however the market construction of noncompetitive kind are going to be chosen during this case as request for T'V is comparatively elastic and not utterly flexible as is that the circumstance in perfectly competitive markets and other people conform to pay higher costs for a lot of options and conditions.
It is not wise to shop for T.V. beneath monopoly because the worth are going to be terribly high and shopper additional will be low. Also, in oligopoly market arrangement the costs are going to be high and solely few companies will be marketing the merchandise with not a lot of selections accessible within the market.
Thus, the most effective sort of market arrangement to shop for T.V.is monopolistic competition.
Answer:
10.51%
Explanation:
The computation of the bond equivalent yield is shown below:
Given that
Par value at redemption = $10,000
Bond price = $9,720
Number of days of maturity = 100 days
Now
Profit of holding this bond = Par value at redemption - Bond purchase price
= $10,000 - $9,720
= $280
Now yield from the 100 days
= profit from holding the bond ÷ Purchase price of the bond
= $280÷ $9,720 × 100
= 2.88
Now the yield annualized is
= 2.88 × 365 days ÷ 100 days
= 10.51%
Answer:
d) $4.00.
Explanation:
Net Income = $34,000
Common shares outstanding = 8,500 shares
Earning Per share = Net Income for the period / Common shares outstanding
Earning Per share = $34,000 / 8,500 shares
Earning Per share = $4 per share
The company's earnings per share is $4.
Divided declared has nothing to do in the calculation of Earning per share because we just measure the earning against each share which involves net income and number of outstanding shares only.
Answer:
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
Yes, as long as the assignment does not increases the burden on Max.
Yes, Claire can assign her obligations under the contract to anyone who accepts.
No, contracts for personal services are not assignable.
No, the assignment is not valid since Max did not give any consideration.
This is most likely not a good strategy for this woman. The fact that this woman has been hired as a freelance web designer means thta the woman is beig paid for her professional expertise. No one else can perform the job in the way that she can perform it. Therefore, she cannot assign this duty to another person.
Answer: The Non Compete is NOT Enforceable.
Explanation:
An Agreement not to compete with your previous company is a RESTRICTIVE covenant that was generally introduced to ensure that Upper and Middle Management who were generally privy to Trade Secrets in an Organization do not take that information somewhere else and use it against that old company usually in exchange for better compensation packages.
Hernandez joined Access Organics and regrettably was not given a pay increase or any other special considerations. This is very relevant.
For a Non-compete to hold relevance especially if it is signed AFTER an employee has already being working in an organization, there needs to be SUFFICIENT Considerations that gave the employee better terms such as more job security or better benefits as a result of signing said agreement.
Andy Hernandez received no such benefits in return for signing the agreement and so the Non-compete Agreement lacks said Sufficient Considerations.
The Non-compete is therefore NOT ENFORCEABLE.
It is worthy of note that in the actual case, the Judge ruled in favor of of Andy Hernandez.
If you require further clarification do react or comment.
